Judgments

Search
(1) LIU ZIJIA (2) LEI QU v ALIBEK TULEPOV
CASE No: AIFC-C/CFI/2022/0030
03.02.2023
Judges
Thomas Montagu-Smith KC
Summary
The Сlaimants, who owned 90% of the shares in an AIFC company established for cryptocurrency mining, sought a court order requiring the defendant, a 10% shareholder, to withdraw from the company and transfer his shares to them. The Court found that the claimants had failed to identify any legal basis that would justify depriving the defendant of his ownership rights. The Court held that any dispute regarding the company's assets or winding up should be resolved through voluntary liquidation procedures or agreement among shareholders and therefore dismissed the claim.
FREEDOM FINANCE JSC v EGOR ROMANYUK
CASE No: AIFC-C/CFI/2022/0020
01.02.2023
Judges
Sir Rupert Jackson
Summary
Freedom Finance JSC brought a claim against its former vice-president, Egor Romanyuk, alleging that he breached confidentiality and non-disparagement obligations contained in a separation agreement by publishing critical statements about the company and its founder on social media. The Court found that the defendant had breached the non-disparagement clause and was therefore liable under the contractual penalty provision. However, applying Article 297 of the Civil Code of Kazakhstan and taking into account the claimant’s own conduct and principles of good faith, the Court reduced the contractual penalty from USD 5 million to USD 100,000.
“ALAIGYR JOINT VENTURE” LLP v “BAUPROJEKT” LLP
CASE No: AIFC-C/CFI/2023/0001
18.01.2023
Judges
Sir Rupert Jackson
Summary
Alaigyr Joint Venture LLP applied to the AIFC Court for an anti-suit injunction to prevent BauProjekt LLP from continuing court proceedings in the Karaganda Economic Court, arguing that the dispute should be resolved through arbitration under an arbitration agreement contained in a related contract. The Court found that the court proceedings were based on a separate contract that did not contain an arbitration clause and that any overlap with the ongoing arbitration was limited. The application was dismissed because it was brought late, was not properly notified to the defendant, and failed to demonstrate sufficient grounds for restraining the Karaganda proceedings.
MR RISKULOV RUSTAM DANIYAR UGLI v GRANTLY LLP
CASE No: AIFC-C/SCC/2022/0022
23.12.2022
Judges
Thomas Montagu-Smith KC
Summary
KOZHABAY ABDILDA ALIBEKULY v “QOSIL LIMITED” PRIVATE COMPANY
CASE No: AIFC-C/SCC/2022/0021
19.12.2022
Judges
The Lord Banner KC
Summary